Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI vs Atto 8 Premium FWD Comparison

Car Information

217

/

355

/

/

8.6

/

58

/

19

Dimensions

7

5

5000

5040

1990

1996

1750

1760

2900

2950

/

20

/

5.9 M

/

165 mm

Fuel Economy

/

34.7

71

60

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.25

/

/

PU

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

15.6

/

/

10

Battery/Charging

/

40

Transmission

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

/

Double Wishbone Type

/

Five-link

Wheels/brakes

/

255/50 R20

/

255/50 R20

Key Spec

3.8 L - 3.8 L

1.5

291 - 291

275 - 480

8 Speed AT & Automatic

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.8 ​

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

291

275

217

/

6100

/

355

/

5200

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Sport / Normal / Eco

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Atto 8 Premium FWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickAtto 8 Premium FWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI if you care more about power; choose Atto 8 Premium FWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2021 4.0L SE Titanium

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F-Pace 2023 2.0T S (250 PS)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F-Pace 2024 2.0T S (250 PS)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2024 2.0T S (250 PS)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar F Pace 2023 2.0T S (250 PS)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI has a fuel consumption of No data, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a fuel consumption of 2.88. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI has a wheelbase of 2900, while Atto 8 Premium FWD has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 8 Premium FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI uses No data, while Atto 8 Premium FWD uses Front Drive.