CarteaCompare CarsTelluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI vs Starray GL 2.0TD

Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI vs Starray GL 2.0TD Comparison

Car Information

217

/

355

/

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

4

/

1990 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

5000

4670 mm

1990

1900 mm

1750

1705 mm

2900

2777 mm

/

5 Doors

/

650 L

/

190 mm

Fuel Economy

/

11 Km/L

71

54 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

/

/

13.2

/

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.8 L - 3.8 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

291 - 291

218 - 218

8 Speed AT & Automatic

7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

Engine

3.8 ​

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

291

218 BHP

217

/

6100

/

355

325 Nm

5200

/

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Collision Safety Cut-Out
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • Starray GL 2.0TD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickStarray GL 2.0TD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI if you care more about interior space; choose Starray GL 2.0TD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Tesla | Tesla Model Y 2024 Long Range (AWD)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Peugeot | 3008 1.6T Hybrid4 (AWD)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Audi | Q3 35 TFSI Advanced 2.0L

Kia | Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI

VS

Audi | Audi Q3 2023 35 TFSI Advanced (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI has a fuel consumption of No data, while Starray GL 2.0TD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI has a wheelbase of 2900, while Starray GL 2.0TD has a wheelbase of 2777 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Telluride 3.8 ​V6 GDI uses No data, while Starray GL 2.0TD uses Front Wheel Drive.