Teramont R-Line vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
European
Chinese
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
21
/
5 Doors
5 Doors
5103
4760 mm
1990
1930 mm
1787
1927 mm
2980
2750 mm
583
400 L
180
224 m
Fuel Economy
9.7 Km/L
15 Km/L
70 L
75 L
9.7 Km/L
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Keyless
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport
Standard
2nd Seat Row
/
Front And Rear
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger Airbag With Front Passenger Airbag Deactivation.Curtain Airbag System For All 3 rows, Side Airbags In Front.
/
✓
/
Front Assist
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Mounting 3 Child Seats On The 2nd Row
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
Harman Kardon Premium Audio System With Subwoofer And Center Speaker
/
/
9
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
2.0 L
235 BHP - 280 BHP
342 BHP
8-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
4
4
270 BHP
342 BHP
370 Nm
648 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Teramont R-Line
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T HEV
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Teramont R-Line if you care more about interior space; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Teramont R-Line has a fuel consumption of 10.31, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Teramont R-Line has a wheelbase of 2980, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Teramont R-Line, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Teramont R-Line uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.