Territory Ambient vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1798 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4630 mm
4760 mm
1935 mm
1930 mm
1706 mm
1927 mm
2726 mm
2750 mm
385 L
400 L
190 mm
224 m
Fuel Economy
15.9
10 Km/L
60 L
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
TFT
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.8 L
2.0 L
190 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.8 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
190 BHP
224 BHP
320 Nm
387 Nm
/
Single Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Territory Ambient
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Territory Ambient if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Territory Ambient has a fuel consumption of 6.29, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Territory Ambient is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Territory Ambient has a wheelbase of 2726 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Territory Ambient uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.