Ti 3 RWD Pro vs All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
Dimensions
5
5
4605
4341
1900
2052
1720
1693
/
1235
/
1785
/
478
/
5.07
/
491
Fuel Economy
/
50
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
✓
Safety
/
Front Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
235/60 R18
215/65 R16
235/60 R18
215/65 R16
/
✓
/
Drum
Key Spec
TBD
/
218 BHP - 422 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
1.6
Electric
Gasoline
218 BHP
115
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ti 3 RWD Pro
All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTi 3 RWD Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price; choose All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while All-New Duster PE 1.6L 4×2 CVT uses No data.