Ti 3 RWD Pro vs Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) Comparison

Car Information

7.9

/

501

/

65.28

/

Engine / Motor

/

180

/

4

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4605

4650

1900

1850

1720

1705

/

2700

/

590

Fuel Economy

/

11.4

/

58

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

218 BHP - 422 BHP

175 BHP

DHT

Automatic

Electric

Gasoline

TBD

/

5

5 Seater

/

1.8 L

/

TBD

Engine

/

1.8 L

Electric

Gasoline

218 BHP

177 BHP

/

245

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ti 3 RWD Pro

    • Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD)

      • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
      • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
      • Rear Defogger
      • Welcome Light
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
      • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickChangan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about power; choose Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

    Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

    VS

    Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while Changan CS75 2022 1.8T GDI Basic (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.