Ti 3 RWD Pro vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4605
4341 mm
1900
1804 mm
1720
1693 mm
/
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/60 R18
/
235/60 R18
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
218 BHP - 422 BHP
105 BHP - 153 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5
5 - 5
/
1.3 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
218 BHP
115 BHP
/
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ti 3 RWD Pro
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.