Ti 3 RWD Pro vs EREV RWD Comparison

Car Information

7.9

/

501

1,152 km

65.28

/

/

3.63 kWh/L

Dimensions

5

5

4605

4,825

1900

1,980

1720

1,620

/

2,940

Fuel Economy

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

235/60 R18

/

235/60 R18

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

218 BHP - 422 BHP

310 - 590

DHT

AT & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic & Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic.

Electric

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

/

5

5

/

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

TBD

Engine

/

1.5 L

Electric

Hybrid

218 BHP

310

/

1,152

/

367

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ti 3 RWD Pro

    • EREV RWD

      Review Comparison

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Positive

      • No data found

      Negative

      • No data found

      Related comparisons

      Editor's PickTi 3 RWD Pro

      Expert / Editor Recommendation

      Choose Ti 3 RWD Pro if you care more about price; choose EREV RWD if you care more about power.

      Popular Car Comparisons

      Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

      VS

      Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

      Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

      VS

      Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

      Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

      VS

      Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

      Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

      VS

      Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

      Denza | Ti 3 RWD Pro

      VS

      Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

      Q&A

      • According to fuel consumption data, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a fuel consumption of No data, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
      • In terms of interior space, Ti 3 RWD Pro has a wheelbase of No data, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
      • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ti 3 RWD Pro uses Rear Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.