Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort vs GS Sport 1.8L Classic Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4200
4440 mm
1760
1833 mm
1570
1560 mm
2555
2700 mm
341
330 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.5 Km/L
/
60 L
/
13.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.8 L
109 BHP - 113
130 BHP - 133 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
109 BHP
130 BHP
140
170 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
GS Sport 1.8L Classic
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS Sport 1.8L Classic
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose GS Sport 1.8L Classic if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS Sport 1.8L Classic, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort uses Front Drive, while GS Sport 1.8L Classic uses Front Wheel Drive.