Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
20"
4200
4785
1760
1930
1570
1625
2555
2880
341
/
Fuel Economy
/
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
109 BHP - 113
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 - 5
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
109 BHP
496 hp
140
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort uses Front Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.