Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
3
/
185
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4200
4.314
1760
1.809
1570
1.624
2555
2.585
341
448
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
109 BHP - 113
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Petrol
109 BHP
160 BHP
140
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro 2025 1.5L Comfort uses Front Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.