Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
16
/
5
/
4200
4360 mm
1760
2032 mm
1570
1525 mm
2555
2670 mm
341
380 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.9 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.2 L - 1.6 L
109 BHP - 113
155 BHP
Automatic & CVT
TBD
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5L
/
111 BHP
155 BHP
/
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose C4 Feel if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, C4 Feel, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.