Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5 Seater

16

/

5

/

4200

4545 mm

1760

1856 mm

1570

1668 mm

2555

2680 mm

341

470 L

Fuel Economy

/

14.7 Km/L

/

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

Cloth

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

Dual Front Airbags

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.25

/

/

/

/

4

/

Transmission

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

109 BHP - 113

165 BHP - 248

Automatic & CVT

8AT

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

1.5L

/

111 BHP

165 BHP

/

265 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ECO, Normal

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
  • GS4 1.5T GB

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

VS

Haval | Haval H2 2018 1.5L Dignity

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 S

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2020 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

VS

Renault | Renault Duster 2019 2.0L PE (4x4)

Chery | Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort

VS

Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.