Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
/
11.3
/
✓
Engine / Motor
/
193
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
16
✓
5
/
4200
4.355
1760
1.810
1570
1.625
2555
2.670
341
358
Fuel Economy
/
12.5
/
63
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
109 BHP - 113
150 - 150
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
1.5L
/
111 BHP
150 BHP
/
197
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and striking exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Reliable and consistent performance
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- The infotainment system is outdated
- Limited engine choices
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 2 Pro Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price; choose Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2.670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while Mitsubishi ASX 2018 2.0L GLX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.