Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5
16
20"
5
/
4200
4785
1760
1930
1570
1625
2555
2880
341
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
/
56
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
15.6
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
19
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5L
109 BHP - 113
496 hp
Automatic & CVT
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
1.5L
/
111 BHP
496 hp
/
Turbocharge
/
365
/
675
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Max RS , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.