Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX Comparison
Car Information
/
10.9
/
✓
Engine / Motor
/
170
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
16
/
5
/
4200
4.314
1760
1.809
1570
1.624
2555
2.585
341
448
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
/
48
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Cloth
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.3 L - 1.5 L
109 BHP - 113
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
1.5L
/
111 BHP
112 BHP
/
150
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while MG ZS 2021 1.5L LUX uses Front Wheel Drive.