Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort vs X95 1.6T Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
185 km/h
/
4
/
1598 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
16
/
5
5 Doors
4200
4858 mm
1760
1925 mm
1570
1780 mm
2555
2855 mm
341
/
/
210 mm
Fuel Economy
/
12.3 Km/L
/
57 L
/
12.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
12.3
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L
109 BHP - 113
197 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
7 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5L
/
111 BHP
197 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
290 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
X95 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort if you care more about price; choose X95 1.6T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while X95 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2555, while X95 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2855 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X95 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 2 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while X95 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.