Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort vs 11 AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
18
/
5
5 Doors
4318
4880 mm
1831
1970 mm
1662
1601 mm
2610
2975 mm
/
545 L
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Cloth， PVC
Vinyl Upholstery
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags, Front Side Airbags, Side Curtain Airbags
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
✓
/
✓
/
Standard LCD
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
/
111 BHP - 156
570 - 599 BHP
Automatic & CVT
AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
650 km
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
1.5TCI
/
145 BHP
599 BHP
/
650 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Motor
/
13.5
/
options.Lithium
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
11 AWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort if you care more about price; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2610, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.