Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort vs BJ30e Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
18
/
5
/
4318
/
1831
/
1662
/
2610
/
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Cloth， PVC
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags, Front Side Airbags, Side Curtain Airbags
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
111 BHP - 156
154 BHP - 185
Automatic & CVT
7DCT & DHT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
1.5TCI
/
145 BHP
154 BHP
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
BJ30e
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBJ30e
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose BJ30e if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while BJ30e has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2610, while BJ30e has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while BJ30e uses No data.