Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort vs CRV DX (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
18
/
5
5 Doors
4318
4706 mm
1831
1866 mm
1662
1681 mm
2610
2700 mm
/
375 L
Fuel Economy
/
11 Km/L
/
58 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Cloth， PVC
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags, Front Side Airbags, Side Curtain Airbags
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 2.4 L
111 BHP - 156
184 BHP - 190
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 7
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5TCI
/
145 BHP
190 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
CRV DX (2WD)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort if you care more about price; choose CRV DX (2WD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while CRV DX (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2610, while CRV DX (2WD) has a wheelbase of 2700 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CRV DX (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while CRV DX (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.