Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort vs Juke 1.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
999 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
18
/
5
5 Doors
4318
4210 mm
1831
1800 mm
1662
1595 mm
2610
2636 mm
/
251 L
/
179 m
Fuel Economy
/
15 Km/L
/
52 L
/
15 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Cloth， PVC
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Dual Front Airbags, Front Side Airbags, Side Curtain Airbags
/
Front
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
7
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
6
/
Android LCD
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.0 L - 1.6 L
113 BHP - 156
115 BHP - 190 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
1.5TCI
/
145 BHP
115 BHP
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
/
180 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Juke 1.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort if you care more about overall equipment; choose Juke 1.0T if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Juke 1.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort has a wheelbase of 2610, while Juke 1.0T has a wheelbase of 2636 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Juke 1.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 4 Pro Comfort uses Front Drive, while Juke 1.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.