Tiggo 7 CSH vs G318 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
19
/
4553
5010
1862
1985
1696
1895
2670
2880
Fuel Economy
41.7
16.3
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Battery/Charging
4
/
Transmission
DHT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Key Spec
1.5L
1.5
204
252 BHP
DHT
DHT
Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5L
1.5
Hybrid
Hybrid
204
252 BHP
365
/
Motor
6.6
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 7 CSH
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
G318 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 7 CSH
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 7 CSH if you care more about price; choose G318 Standard if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 7 CSH has a fuel consumption of 2.4, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, Tiggo 7 CSH is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 7 CSH has a wheelbase of 2670, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 7 CSH uses Front Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.