Tiggo 7 CSH vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
19
/
4553
4781 mm
1862
1920 mm
1696
1671 mm
2670
2815 mm
/
5 Doors
/
500 L
/
187 m
Fuel Economy
41.7
16 Km/L
/
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
Driver Seat
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
12.3
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
8
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
4
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
204
261 BHP
365
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
6.6
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.0 L
/
261 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 7 CSH
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRX Comfort 2.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 7 CSH if you care more about fuel economy; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 7 CSH has a fuel consumption of 2.4, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, Tiggo 7 CSH is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 7 CSH has a wheelbase of 2670, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 7 CSH uses Front Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.