Tiggo 8 Pro Max vs 408 GT Comparison

Car Information

187

158

390

300

4720×1860×1705

/

2.0

/

/

8.2

Dimensions

7

5

19 inch

/

4720

4687

1860

1848

1705

1486

2710

2787

/

536

Fuel Economy

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

10

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

245/50 R20

/

245/50 R20

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 2.0 L

1.6 L - 2.0 L

254 - 254

143 BHP - 215

7DCT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0

1.6

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

254

215

187

158

390

300

/

5500

/

2000

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 8 Pro Max

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 408 GT

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick408 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 8 Pro Max if you care more about power; choose 408 GT if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Jeep | Jeep Wrangler 2018 Sport 3.6L A/T

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

MG | MG4 64KWh XPower 2025

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2019 4.0L VX3 (4X4)

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2018 4.0L VX3 (4X4)

Chery | Tiggo 8 Pro Max

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.5L GDi (FWD) Smart

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a fuel consumption of No data, while 408 GT has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 8 Pro Max has a wheelbase of 2710, while 408 GT has a wheelbase of 2787. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 408 GT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 8 Pro Max uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 408 GT uses No data.