Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
205 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
19
/
4725
4855 mm
1860
1860 mm
1705
1465 mm
/
2805 mm
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
52.6
11.8 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Battery/Charging
4
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
279
240 BHP
365
350 Nm
Motor
6.6
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
157 BHP - 265 BHP
/
AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 1.9, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid has a wheelbase of No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid uses Front Drive, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.