Tiggo 9 vs Cherokee 3.2L Limited Comparison

Car Information

192

/

390

/

4820 ×1930 × 1699

/

8.5

/

2.0

/

Engine / Motor

/

185 km/h

Dimensions

7

5 Seater

16英寸

/

4820

4624 mm

1930

1860 mm

1699

1681 mm

2820

2718 mm

/

5 Doors

/

841 L

Fuel Economy

/

9.9 Km/L

/

60 L

/

9.9 Km/L

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

Safety

✓

/

10

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

15.6

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

4

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

245/50 R20

/

245/50 R20

/

Key Spec

2.0

2.4 L - 3.2 L

254

184 BHP - 272 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7

5 Seater

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

Engine

2.0

3.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

/

254

271 BHP

192

/

390

324 Nm

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo 9

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • Cherokee 3.2L Limited

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCherokee 3.2L Limited

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo 9 if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cherokee 3.2L Limited if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo 9

VS

Volkswagen | Volkswagen Tiguan 2024 1.4 TSI Life

Chery | Tiggo 9

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Blazer 2022 2.5L 1LT (FWD)

Chery | Tiggo 9

VS

Haval | Haval H9 2021 Super Dignity

Chery | Tiggo 9

VS

GMC | GMC Acadia 2020 3.6L SLE2 (FWD)

Chery | Tiggo 9

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi E-HS3 2024 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 9 has a fuel consumption of 8.5, while Cherokee 3.2L Limited has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, Tiggo 9 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo 9 has a wheelbase of 2820, while Cherokee 3.2L Limited has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 9 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Limited uses All Wheel Drive.