Tiggo 9 PHEV vs IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
252
Dimensions
5
5
4810
4937
1925
1988
/
2385
/
20"
/
1671
/
2980
/
617–1,833 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
Suedette-Trimmed Instrument Cluster
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
10
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
14
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
/
/
30–80% in around 17 min
Transmission
AT
1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox
Chassis & Steering
/
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
AWD
/
Double wishbone independent suspension
/
Multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Ventilated discs
/
Ventilated discs
/
235/50 R20
/
235/50 R20
Key Spec
1.5
/
610
671
AT
1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox
Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
/
Hybrid
Electric
Turbocharge
/
1.5 TGDI
/
610
671
920
800
Technologies
Eco + Normal + Sports
/
/
3
/
12
/
1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
Ternary NMC
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 9 PHEV
- Number of Airbags
IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Lane Following Assist
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 9 PHEV if you care more about price; choose IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 9 PHEV has a fuel consumption of No data, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 9 PHEV has a wheelbase of No data, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a wheelbase of 2980. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 9 PHEV uses No data, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.