Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
20
/
4810
4980 mm
1925
1950 mm
1742
1780 mm
2800
2920 mm
Fuel Economy
71
12 Km/L
/
66 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
Battery/Charging
4
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
375
248 BHP
610
400 Nm
Motor
6.6
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 2.0 L
/
248 BHP - 332 BHP
/
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
7 - 7
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS8 2.0T GT (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy; choose GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 1.41, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has a wheelbase of 2800, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses Front Drive, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.