Tiggo 7 Luxury vs Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
/
190 km/h
/
4
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
18
/
5
5 Doors
4500
5004 mm
1842
1978 mm
1746
1802 mm
2670
2900 mm
/
470 L
Fuel Economy
16.6
9.4 Km/L
/
74 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
6
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
SONY
/
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.6 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
154 - 197 BHP
250 BHP - 271 BHP
6DCT AT & 7DCT
9AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1.5T
/
197 BHP
271 BHP
290
340 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tiggo 7 Luxury
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tiggo 7 Luxury if you care more about price; choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo 7 Luxury has a fuel consumption of 6.02, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Tiggo 7 Luxury is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tiggo 7 Luxury has a wheelbase of 2670, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo 7 Luxury uses Front Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.