Tiggo8 Pro Max COM vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1598 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

18

/

5

5 Doors

4720

4780 mm

1860

1885 mm

1705

1730 mm

2710

2800 mm

/

450 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

14

16 Km/L

/

50 L

/

16 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

Front Row Seats

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

6

/

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

12.3

/

/

8

8

SONY

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

Transmission

7DCT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/55 R18

/

235/55 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

1.6 L

254 - 310 BHP

197 BHP - 290 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 Seater

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

2.0L TDGI

/

254 BHP

290 BHP

390

400 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

    • Power Tailgate
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • TXL Comfort 1.6T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTXL Comfort 1.6T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo8 Pro Max COM if you care more about power; choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 7.14, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, TXL Comfort 1.6T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo8 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2710, while TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, TXL Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo8 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive, while TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive.