Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE vs CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

185 km/h

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

18

/

5

/

4720

4949 mm

1860

1930 mm

1705

1790 mm

2710

2810 mm

Fuel Economy

/

10.5 Km/L

/

74 L

/

10.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

12.3

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

LCD

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

6

/

Front

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

SONY

/

Transmission

3DHT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

235/55 R18

/

235/55 R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

254 BHP

233 - 233

3DHT

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5

7 - 7

Exterior

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

1.5TCI

/

254 BHP

233 BHP

390

360 Nm

Motor

315

/

2

/

125

/

Front and Rear

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

    • Power Tailgate
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE if you care more about power; choose CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (AWD) Smart

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

VS

Exeed | VX Luxury

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

VS

Toyota | RAV4 2.5L Adventure

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 408 2024 1.6T GT

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE

VS

Audi | Audi Q2 2024 35 TFSI Design (150 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE has a fuel consumption of No data, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE has a wheelbase of 2710, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD has a wheelbase of 2810 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tiggo8 Pro PHEV PRE uses Front Drive, while CS95 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD uses Front Wheel Drive.