Titanium 3 RWD vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,605
4490 mm
1,900
1874 mm
1,720
1613 mm
2,745
2750 mm
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Single-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
218 - 422
153 BHP - 305 BHP
Single-speed Automatic
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
218
153 BHP
160 kW
/
310
340 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Titanium 3 RWD
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Titanium 3 RWD if you care more about power; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Titanium 3 RWD has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Titanium 3 RWD has a wheelbase of 2,745, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Titanium 3 RWD uses No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.