TOURING vs M4 Passenger Comparison

Car Information

Gasoline

/

Honda

/

/

/

208.8

/

355

/

5236x1995x1767

/

8.8

/

3.5

/

Engine / Motor

6

/

3471cc

/

/

160

Dimensions

8

9

2080

2020

19 英寸

16

5236

5200

1995

1890

1767

1980

3000

3080

148

160

/

Sliding Door

Fuel Economy

74

80

/

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

11

6

Transmission

10

5

Automatic

5MT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

/

/

Dual Swing Arm Independent

/

Dependent steel leaf spring suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

235/55 R19

215/65 R16

235/55 R19

215/65 R16

/

/

Disc

/

Disc

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3.5 L

2.0 L

250 BHP - 280

145 BHP

Automatic

5MT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

8 - 8

2 - 9

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Naturally Aspirated

/

4

/

11.5:1

/

SOHC i-VTEC

/

280

145 BHP

208.8

/

6000

/

355

185

4700

/

VCM

/

直喷

/

/

2.0L VVT

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • TOURING

    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Driving Recorder
    • Security System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • M4 Passenger

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickM4 Passenger

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose TOURING if you care more about power; choose M4 Passenger if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Honda | TOURING

VS

Honda | EX-L

Honda | TOURING

VS

Voyah | Voyah Dream N4 43kWh

Honda | TOURING

VS

Honda | LX

Honda | TOURING

VS

Kia | Carnival Hybird 1.6L

Honda | TOURING

VS

Kia | Carnival 3.5L EX FOP 2026

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, TOURING has a fuel consumption of 8.8, while M4 Passenger has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, TOURING has a wheelbase of 3000, while M4 Passenger has a wheelbase of 3080. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, M4 Passenger, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. TOURING uses Front Drive, while M4 Passenger uses No data.