GR86 A/T 2.4L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4265 mm
4760 mm
1775 mm
1930 mm
1310 mm
1927 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
13.4
10 Km/L
50 L
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
Main Ultrasuede, Side Leather With Yellow Stitching.
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver Airbag, Front Passenger Airbag, Driver's Knees Airbag, Side Airbags, Curtain Airbags.
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
6
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/40 R18
/
215/40 R18
/
Key Spec
2.4 L - 228.0 L
2.0 L
228 BHP - 233 BHP
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6-speed Automatic Transmission & 6-speed Manual Transmission & Automatic Transmission & Manual
Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 4 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
228 BHP
224 BHP
250 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
GR86 A/T 2.4L
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Lane Departure Warning
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose GR86 A/T 2.4L if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a fuel consumption of 7.46, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, GR86 A/T 2.4L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, GR86 A/T 2.4L has a wheelbase of No data, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. GR86 A/T 2.4L uses Rear Wheel Drive , while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.