Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

4

/

2694 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

5 Doors

5

4795 mm

4500

1855 mm

1842

1835 mm

1746

2750 mm

2670

348 L

/

220 mm

/

/

Flush Door

/

18

Fuel Economy

10.4 (KM/L)

16.6

80 L

/

8 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

Interior

Fabric

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

12.3

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

Android LCD

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

6 Speed Automatic

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Drive

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Torsion Beam with Coil Springs

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 4.0 L

/

147 BHP - 235 BHP

/

6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

/

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

7 Seater

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

2.7 L

1.6 L

Petrol

Gasoline

4

/

164 BHP

197 BHP

245 Nm

290

/

1.6L TDGI

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR

    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
  • Tiggo7 Pro Max COM

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Reliability and well known Toyota quality

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Outdated internal technology
  • Less stability at high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR has a fuel consumption of 9.62, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Fortuner 2.7L EXR uses All Wheel Drive , while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.