Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
187 km/h
/
6
/
3956 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
5
4795 mm
4318
1855 mm
1831
1835 mm
1662
2750 mm
2610
348 L
/
220 mm
/
/
Flush Door
/
17
Fuel Economy
9.6 (KM/L)
/
80 L
/
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Leather
Cloth
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Dual Front Airbags
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
No
/
6 Speed Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.4 L - 4.0 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
147 BHP - 235 BHP
111 BHP - 156
6 Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
4
/
235 BHP
111 BHP
376 Nm
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
/
✓
ECO, Normal
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR has a fuel consumption of 10.42, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR has a wheelbase of 2750 mm , while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Fortuner 4.0L VXR uses All Wheel Drive , while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.