CarteaCompare CarsToyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T vs DFSK C35 Standard

Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T vs DFSK C35 Standard Comparison

Car Information

14.5

/

Engine / Motor

160

140

4

/

/

1499

Dimensions

13 Seater

2

14"

5.915

4500

1.950

1680

2.280

1985

3.860

3050

/

800

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

15.5

70

55L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

6-Speed Manual

5MT

Chassis & Steering

/

/

Rear Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Macpherson independent suspension

/

MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Disc

/

Drum

/

185/80R14

/

185/80R14

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

1.5

88 BHP - 277

114

6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual

5MT

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 - 13 Seater

2

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

1.5

Petrol

Gasoline

24V V6 DOHC DUAL VVT-i,7GR-FKS

/

4

/

277 BHP

114

360

148

/

Naturally Aspirated

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • DFSK C35 Standard

    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious and versatile space
  • High durability and reliability
  • Excellent stability and driving quality

Negative

  • Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
  • Fuel economy is lower than expected
  • Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDFSK C35 Standard

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T if you care more about overall equipment; choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2024 L3 VIP

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot Traveller 2023 L3 VIP

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

VS

Peugeot | Traveller L3 VIP

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2019 3.7L 150XL (Low Roof)

Toyota | Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T

VS

Ford | Ford Transit 2020 3.7L 150XL (Low Roof)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T has a fuel consumption of 10, while DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45. Therefore, DFSK C35 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T has a wheelbase of 3.860, while DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Toyota Hiace 3.5L Commuter (13 seater) M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive.