Transit Cargo Van 350M MR vs Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) Comparison
Car Information
/
✓
/
Engine / Motor
150
160
4
4
Dimensions
3
13 Seater
16
/
/
1880
/
2285
/
3110
/
9800
/
5380
Fuel Economy
/
9.5
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8AT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
235/65 R16C
/
235/65 R16C
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.2 L - 3.7 L
2.5 L - 3.5 L
125 BHP - 299
88 BHP - 277
& 10AT & 8AT & Automatic & Manual
6-Speed Automatic & 6-Speed Automatic Transmission & 6-Speed Manual & 6-Speed Manual Transmission & Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 - 13
3 - 13 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
2.7 L
Diesel
Gasoline
165
149 BHP
331
240
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow/Haul
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Transit Cargo Van 350M MR
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates)
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Transit Cargo Van 350M MR if you care more about power; choose Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Transit Cargo Van 350M MR has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a fuel consumption of 10.53. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Transit Cargo Van 350M MR has a wheelbase of No data, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Transit Cargo Van 350M MR uses Front Drive, while Toyota Hiace 2017 2.7L Commuter High Roof LWB (13 seates) uses Rear Wheel Drive.