Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4500 mm
5115 mm
1865 mm
1980 mm
1650 mm
1920 mm
2680 mm
2890 mm
620 L
1004 L
210 m
221 m
Fuel Economy
11.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
54 L
110 L
11.4 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Fabric
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.5 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
132 BHP - 190
240 BHP - 409
& 7-DCT & AT & Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
4
151 BHP
271 BHP
192 Nm
385 Nm
/
Twin Turbo
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson Comfort+ 2.0L uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.