CarteaCompare CarsTucson Premium+ 2.5L vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Tucson Premium+ 2.5L vs Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

220 km/h

4

6

2496 cc

3598 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4500 mm

5539 mm

1865 mm

1875 mm

1650 mm

1857 mm

2680 mm

3487 mm

620 L

1005 L

210 m

254 m

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

11 Km/L

54 L

83 L

10 Km/L

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

Leather

Leather

Digital

Digital

Dual Zone

Single

/

/

/

Electric

Electric

Standard

Standard

/

Safety

Infotainment

10.25

12

Android LCD

Android LCD

8

9

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.5 L

3.6 L

132 BHP - 190

285 BHP

& 7-DCT & AT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

LED

LED

Engine

In-Line

V

2.5 L

3.6 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

4

187 BHP

285 BHP

242 Nm

352 Nm

Technologies

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
  • Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
  • Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies

Negative

  • Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
  • Engine response and noise at high speeds
  • Storage space is limited as much as

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tucson Premium+ 2.5L if you care more about overall equipment; choose Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

VS

Land Rover | Defender 90 SE Base (P300)

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Dual Tone 2.4T

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

VS

Toyota | Prado Adventure Mono Tone 2.4T

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Premium+ 2.5L

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tucson Premium+ 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 10, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tucson Premium+ 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L has a wheelbase of 3487 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tucson Premium+ 2.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while Gladiator Sand Runner 3.6L uses All Wheel Drive.