Tundra 1794 Edition vs Canyon AT4X 2.7T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
160 km/h
6
4
3390 cc
2698 cc
American
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5933 mm
5415 mm
2023
1838 mm
1984 mm
2072 mm
4006 mm
3327 mm
/
options. L
/
271 m
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
7.2 Km/L
120 L
80 L
7 Km/L
7.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14
11.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
14
7
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.4 L
2.7 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
437 BHP
310 BHP
790 Nm
583 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
2.7 L
/
310 BHP - 313 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tundra 1794 Edition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Canyon AT4X 2.7T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Canyon AT4X 2.7T if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a fuel consumption of 13.89. Therefore, Canyon AT4X 2.7T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T has a wheelbase of 3327 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Canyon AT4X 2.7T uses Four Wheel Drive.