Tundra 1794 Edition vs DFSK C32 Standard Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

6

/

3390 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

/

5933 mm

4940

2023

1655

1984 mm

1910

4006 mm

3050

/

1172

/

14"

/

2060x1540x370

/

/

/

2295

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

18

120 L

/

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

/

Transmission

Automatic

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Macpherson Independent Suspension

/

Five-bar Rear Non-independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc

/

Drum

/

175 R14 LT

/

175 R14 LT

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

In-Line

3.4 L

1.5

Hybrid

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

437 BHP

114

790 Nm

/

/

Naturally Aspirated

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tundra 1794 Edition

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • DFSK C32 Standard

    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDFSK C32 Standard

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose DFSK C32 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while DFSK C32 Standard has a fuel consumption of 5.56. Therefore, DFSK C32 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while DFSK C32 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while DFSK C32 Standard uses Rear Drive.