Tundra 1794 Edition vs Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT Comparison

Car Information

/

5287 x 1850 x1874

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

170

6

/

3390 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4 Doors

/

5933 mm

5287

2023

1850

1984 mm

1832

4006 mm

/

/

1795

/

490

/

219

/

1510'1562'475

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

12

120 L

73

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

10" Multimedia screen

/

3.5"

/

Driver Seat

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

16" Full size

/

/

Infotainment

14

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

4

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

6MT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double wishbone + stabilizer bar

/

Steel Spring

Wheels/brakes

/

255/70R16

/

255/70R16

Key Spec

3.4 L - 3.4 L

2.0

348 - 437

225

10-speed Automatic & Automatic

6MT & 8AT

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 - 6

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.4 L

2.0

Hybrid

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

437 BHP

225

790 Nm

360

/

Electric Fuel Cap

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tundra 1794 Edition

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Lock

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about power; choose Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2020 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2019 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2020 5.0L V8 Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2019 5.0L V8 Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2018 Rebel Crew Cab

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Dongfeng Rich 7 Z72A MT uses Rear Drive.