Tundra 1794 Edition vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

182 km/h

6

/

3390 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

5933 mm

5330 mm

2023

1963 mm

1984 mm

1897 mm

4006 mm

3180 mm

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

10.2 Km/L

120 L

80 L

7 Km/L

10.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.4 L - 3.4 L

2.4 L

348 - 437

210 BHP

10-speed Automatic & Automatic

Automatic & Manual

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 6

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.4 L

2.4 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

437 BHP

210 BHP

790 Nm

320 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tundra 1794 Edition

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLandtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2020 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2019 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2020 5.0L V8 Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2019 5.0L V8 Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Toyota | Tundra 1794 Edition

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2018 Rebel Crew Cab

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.