CarteaCompare CarsTundra 1794 Edition vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T

Tundra 1794 Edition vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

160 km/h

6

/

3390 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

6 Seater

4 Doors

/

5933 mm

5336 mm

2023

2075 mm

1984 mm

1758 mm

4006 mm

3150 mm

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

8.3 Km/L

120 L

80 L

7 Km/L

8.3 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

/

Transmission

Automatic

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.4 L

2.5 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

437 BHP

158 BHP

790 Nm

233 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

2.5 L

/

158 BHP - 168 BHP

/

Automatic & Manual

/

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

5 Seater - 6 Seater

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tundra 1794 Edition

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickNavara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T if you care more about fuel economy.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3150 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.