Tundra 1794 Edition vs Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

6

/

3390 cc

/

American

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

5933 mm

5410 mm

2023

1934 mm

1984 mm

1886 mm

4006 mm

3230 mm

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

/

120 L

80 L

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

14

/

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.4 L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

437 BHP

188 BHP

790 Nm

360 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

Key Spec

/

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

188 - 188

/

8AT & AT8 & Automatic

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

5 - 5

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Tundra 1794 Edition

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Poer 2.0T Top (4WD)

    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickPoer 2.0T Top (4WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) if you care more about overall equipment.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) has a wheelbase of 3230 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Poer 2.0T Top (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.