Tundra 1794 Edition vs Shark 6 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
160 km/h
6
4
3390 cc
1500 cc
American
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
5933 mm
5457 mm
2023
1971 mm
1984 mm
1925 mm
4006 mm
3260 mm
/
1200 L
/
230 mm
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
12.8
120 L
59 L
7 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
14
/
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Key Spec
3.4 L - 3.4 L
1.5T
348 - 437
430 BHP
10-speed Automatic & Automatic
AT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 6
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
In-Line
3.4 L
1.5T
Hybrid
Hybrid
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
437 BHP
430 BHP
790 Nm
650 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tundra 1794 Edition
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tundra 1794 Edition if you care more about interior space; choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tundra 1794 Edition has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8. Therefore, Shark 6 Premium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tundra 1794 Edition has a wheelbase of 4006 mm, while Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra 1794 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra 1794 Edition uses Four Wheel Drive, while Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive .