Tundra SR vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
182 km/h
Dimensions
6
5 Seater
5,932
5330 mm
2,032
1963 mm
1,981
1897 mm
3,701
3180 mm
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
/
80 L
/
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
10-speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Engine
3.4L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
348
210 BHP
549
320 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.4 L
/
210 BHP
/
Automatic & Manual
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Tundra SR
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickLandtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Tundra SR if you care more about interior space; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Tundra SR has a fuel consumption of 10, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Tundra SR has a wheelbase of 3,701, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tundra SR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Tundra SR uses No data, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.