TXL Comfort 1.6T vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
161 km/h
4
/
1598 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4780 mm
4341 mm
1885 mm
1804 mm
1730 mm
1693 mm
2800 mm
2676 mm
450 L
414 L
200 m
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
50 L
50 L
16 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
197 BHP - 261 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
8AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.6 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
290 BHP
115 BHP
400 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
TXL Comfort 1.6T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose TXL Comfort 1.6T if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, TXL Comfort 1.6T has a fuel consumption of 6.25, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, TXL Comfort 1.6T has a wheelbase of 2800 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, TXL Comfort 1.6T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. TXL Comfort 1.6T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.