UNI-V 2.0 Sport vs Pegas 1.4L M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
170 km/h
/
1368 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18
/
4680
4300 mm
1838
1700 mm
1430
1460 mm
2750
2570 mm
/
4 Doors
/
475 L
/
150 mm
Fuel Economy
51
43 L
/
13
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
235/45 R18
/
235/45 R18
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 2.0 L
1.4 L - 1.4 L
185 BHP - 229 BHP
93 BHP - 95
Automatic
3 Speed AT & Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
229 BHP
95 BHP
390
133 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
UNI-V 2.0 Sport
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Pegas 1.4L M/T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Comfortable interior space in comparison with competitors
- Good value for the price
Negative
- Average performance on highways
- The quality of the cabin materials is less competitive
- Lack of advanced driving techniques
Related comparisons
Editor's PickUNI-V 2.0 Sport
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose UNI-V 2.0 Sport if you care more about price; choose Pegas 1.4L M/T if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, UNI-V 2.0 Sport has a fuel consumption of No data, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, UNI-V 2.0 Sport has a wheelbase of 2750, while Pegas 1.4L M/T has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, UNI-V 2.0 Sport, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. UNI-V 2.0 Sport uses Front Wheel Drive, while Pegas 1.4L M/T uses Front Drive.